Login | Member Center | Contact Us | Forms | Site Map | Archives | Alerts | Subscriber services | e-Edition
Jobs - Employment - Careers

HomeOpinionLetters to the Editor

Letters to the Editor: Oct. 12

Gay rights are already protected

Regarding your shortsighted editorial Thursday about Proposition 8:

This proposition does not seek to "protect marriage" but to "define marriage." Is it possible that you do not see the long-range ramifications this will have on many of our institutions if it does not pass?

California has very strict anti-discrimination laws. If this does not pass, it could cause church adoption agencies that place children only in homes with a husband and wife because of religious beliefs to close their doors. This has already happened to Catholic Charities in Boston. Churches may lose their tax-exempt status if found to "practice discrimination" because they will not marry or provide other services for same-gender couples. This then deprives churches of their constitutional rights.

There will be a huge impact on our school system. When marriage is talked about in health classes (required by the California Education Code), homosexual marriages will have to be put on the same plane as heterosexual marriages and taught as such. There will be serious clashes between the school system and the values and beliefs that children are taught at home. Textbooks will have to be changed to reflect this, and that means a huge financial expenditure.

Gay people's rights in California are totally protected. They are allowed unions with all the legal rights as the rest of the people.

Defining marriage in the traditional manner does nothing that takes away anything they already have.

The Bible says that marriage is between a man and a woman. Are you above the word of God? Are you a true and believing Christian? Stand up for your rights. Do your duty and vote yes on Proposition 8. How many times do we have to vote on this? This time we have the opportunity to put it in our constitution and make it stick. Vote yes on Proposition 8!

Harold Bassett

Fall River Mills

Moral compass has lost bearing

I'd like to make a comment about your editorial recommending a no vote on Proposition 8. Your own words (out of context): "The family is the foundation of civilization." Absolutely true. So how can you possibly be in favor of same-sex marriages when by actual biological fact those unions are incapable of producing families and therefore by your own definition would and do in fact undermine the foundation of society? You go on to state that compared with other social ills currently rampant in our society (drugs, alcohol, materialism, etc.) it's "hard to see what harm" same-sex marriages do. So then, in your view any and all deviant behavior is OK as long as it's "not out of the ordinary"? It's obvious that your moral compass is seriously defective.

Wallace F. Sweet

Redding

Our free speech is indeed under threat

Proposition 8 is clear. I must disagree with the opinion that the redefinition of marriage causes no harm. As pointed out in the Thursday editorial, homosexual couples already have protection under the law and can in fact be united in domestic partnerships.

Invoking the First Amendment as a protection for those, like me, who have strongly held beliefs that marriage has been defined by God is a bit naive. If Proposition 8 does not pass, public schools will be required to recognize same-sex unions in the same light as traditional heterosexual marriage. This means anyone who disagrees will be speaking illegally. There will be no room for First Amendment protection. Hate speech has a very broad definition and California has sweeping anti-discrimination laws.

Four California judges with their decision in May to allow same-sex marriage have left marriage a murky identity in California.

If you are undecided on Proposition 8, a clear definition of marriage as a union between one man and one woman neither "picks one's pocket nor breaks one's leg." Vote yes on Proposition 8. It's priceless.

Carolyn Yates

Red Bluff

Let's end the fight over marriage

Much of the fight over "gay marriage" is merely a fight over the word "marriage."

I propose this:

Give the term "marriage" back to the religions. Only religions can authorize marriages. And a marriage, being solely a religious/spiritual institution, will not be controlled or even connected to secular law in any way. Religious groups get to say who gets married. If you find a religion that will marry you, you're in.

Give the term "civil union" to our secular, legal institutions. Only our democratic government can authorize civil unions. Civil unions, and not marriages, will spell out secular rights and responsibilities concerning taxes, adoption, property rights, etc.

One may choose a marriage alone, a civil union alone, or both. Civil unions have no religious impact. Marriages have no civil impact.

Many people on both sides of this issue will find fault with this idea. The only fault I find is that the term "civil union" is boring, way less dramatic than "marriage." Oh well, working together, I'm sure we can solve that, too.

Lawrence Harris

Redding

Churches have right and duty to speak

This election season features lots of direct involvement by churches in the political process, especially in relation to Propositions 4 and 8. There is also concern about church and state issues. Federal law has forbidden candidate endorsements since 1954, but not promoting or opposing legislation. The Knights of Columbus or any religious organization can do as they feel led regarding ballot propositions and legislation. But there is much more at stake.

Any law that restricts the right of church leaders to speak is in direct violation of the First Amendment, which states that Congress shall make no law restricting the free exercise of religion. No means no. Power to tax is the power to restrict; exempting churches is not a gift from governments, but rather a recognition that exercise of faith is a gift from a power above all governments. It is also an acknowledgement that all of our freedoms are the result of revelation given the Body of Christ. Every political ideal that we cherish - from separation of powers through checks and balances to consent of the governed, and everything in the Bill of Rights - was originally articulated in American pulpits. To restrict that creative flow is suicidal. The good news is that the freedoms released by Christians are what give all, including non-Christians, the same liberty to speak freely.

In a quarter century of pastoring, I have chosen not to endorse candidates. Other clergy have chosen differently. But no government has the right to require silence of us or compliance with judicial fiat that violates our faith commitments - through law, lawsuit or withdrawal of a tax exemption. In many nations, including western democracies, clergy are being jailed for speaking in politically incorrect ways. In this nation, the Constitution backs us up in our freedom of faith, and I pray that it always will.

The Rev. James Wilson

Redding

Locking up addicts wastes lives, money

California's harsh punishment for drug use simply doesn't work. Throwing drug users in prison doesn't cure drug addiction any more than locking up drunks cures alcoholism. The cost of incarcerating addicts wastes hundreds of millions of dollars, some of which would be better used for treatment centers and health care.

Proposition 5 expands treatment and rehabilitation for nonviolent drug offenders. Cost of treatment would be offset by reduction in the cost of incarceration and should reduce the need to build more prisons.

Eighty percent of people in prison have a drug problem. Most get no treatment, and upon release go back to drugs and eventually return to prison. Clearly, a better way must be found.

Proposition 5 does not "release drug dealers and violent offenders to terrorize the neighborhood." Proposition 5 is a rehabilitation program, funded and administered to provide appropriate professional treatment for non-violent drug users and endangered teens.

Professionals in drug addiction and law enforcement endorse Proposition 5. So, do the League of Women Voters and the ACLU. It's past time we addressed the size and cost of our prison system and the tragedy of untreated addiction by providing the way to health through Proposition 5.

Joan Manning

Shasta Lake

Wind turbines are deadly to birds

In this age of energy needs, wind power appears to be a noble idea and the approval of the Hatchet Ridge Wind project is an ambitious undertaking.

Sadly, this project will be a death sentence for rare and endangered raptors each year as well as many other species of birds. The wind power industry has a very sad legacy when it comes to bird kills. Hundreds of raptors are killed each year at Altamont Pass alone. New technology and new wind turbine designs are on the horizon that will all but eliminate the raptor kill problem.

I suggest that the county limit the use of the old wind turbine technology at the site and only approve the project making future wind turbine designs mandatory. Peregrine falcons, prairie falcons, golden eagles, bald eagles, red-tail hawks, red shoulder hawks, Cooper's hawks, sharp shinned hawks, merlin falcons, sparrow hawks, great grey owls, horned owls, burrowing owls, barn owls, spotted owls, pygmy owls, as well as many local and migratory bird species, will all be on the kill list for this project. These precious bird species all deserve this consideration.

Jim Wiegand

Redding

Old cemetery is falling to pieces

It is with great interest that I have read recent articles regarding the cleanup of some of our local cemeteries.

I wonder how many people know of the Middletown cemetery on Swasey Drive. It is located on the hill behind the Westside Church.

I believe the cemetery has been there since sometime in the 1800s. In the 1930s I lived right below it across from Grant School. At that time, it wasn't in the best of condition, but the grave markers as I remember were all in pretty good condition. I remember one especially; it had an ornate metal fence around it. It is long gone - can't even find the grave.

A friend and I had checked out the cemetery about two years ago, at that time we found one of the grave stones laying in the yard of the home which is built right next to the cemetery.

Recently, we were in the area and decided to check it out again. We were shocked at what we found. A few of the graves were in fair condition, but the rest were in deplorable shape with only mortuary markers and overgrown with weeds.

This cemetery desperately needs attention.

Where are the family members? Don't they care?

Juanita Griffin Barnes-Tandy

Anderson

Rude hunters leave foul mess behind

I am a gun owner. I do not hunt nor do I have a problem with those who do, as long as they consume what they kill.

However, I do have a problem with some hunters. I walk daily on a gravel road behind my home; others use the road for many purposes. This year at least a couple wonderful and generous hunters shared their kill with our community. They gutted at least three deer and left the offal in the middle of the gravel road.

This road is not miles from nowhere, but within 1,000 feet of many homes.

Next year, when deer season opens, I will greet the hunters, early in the morning. I will do my best to ensure there are no more deer killed so close to my home.

Michael Wiley

Whitmore

What is so great about Obama?

Regarding Tom Brokaw's performance as moderator Tuesday night for the McCain-Obama debate - you liberals must be very proud of him. He successfully filtered any question that might have put Obama on defense, and turned the debate into a completely boring slanted affair. Nice job, Tom! If the American people were to find out about the real Obama, he might lose. I want to pass on a little secret, though - a lot of people already know the real Obama, and between now and Election Day a lot more will find out.

What is so great about Obama? He has no experience, a very shadowy background, is for killing babies born alive after botched abortions, is a personal friend and associate of the despicable domestic terrorist William Ayers and other hate-mongering racists, consistently maligns American troops in time of war, and presents nothing more than tired old Democrat talking points. So what is it about him that recommends him for the presidency? Oh, I know - he is a Democrat, and that is all that matters!

By the way, did you liberals know that Sarah Palin was abducted and brainwashed by space aliens, plans to distribute cigarettes and beer to all second-graders, intends to outlaw soccer, and that one of her businesses is dumping thousands of gallons a day of raw diesel into the Gulf of Alaska? Further, if elected vice president, she is going to get shares in Haliburton, is planning on poisoning all the fresh water in the United States, and is going to undergo a Vulcan mind meld with Dick Cheney. Please, someone send a fax to The Associated Press so we can get this reported. And remember, the truth doesn't matter, this dumb Alaskan woman needs to be stopped at any expense - right?

David A. Perreault

Redding

Candidates differ on helping schools

I recently took the liberty of going to the official Web sites of both Barack Obama and John McCain. I was particularly interested in their stances on education, and compared the two viewpoints. All of the following quotes and facts are taken directly from the candidates' official web sites.

On education, Obama believes "teachers should not be forced to spend the academic year preparing students to fill in bubbles on standardized tests." He wants to "improve student learning in a timely, individualized manner." He feels that teachers should be rewarded for performing their job well, and will provide funding so schools can create intervention programs to reduce the number of dropouts.

McCain "believes parents should be empowered with school choice to send their children to the school that can best educate them" and that "all federal financial support must be predicated on providing parents the ability to move their children, and the dollars associated with them, from failing school." What this means is that, rather than providing universal funding in order to give all schools the means to produce quality students, McCain would provide the majority of the funding to only schools that are deemed the most successful. If a school was suddenly in danger, rather than receiving funding, parents would transfer their students to another campus. The failing school would go under, and teachers would lose their jobs. Obama does agree to this system, but only when it comes to charter schools that have repeatedly underperformed. In addition, in Obama's system these closures would occur only if government-funded interventions were unsuccessful.

McCain believes that schools should be competing for any and all funding. The truth is, all schools should have the funding and tools needed to ensure that no matter what school a child goes to, they can be given the highest quality education possible.

Ansel R. Wilson-Briggs

Palo Cedro

Just which change is it time for?

Thank you, Alana Marie Burke, for your fine article last Sunday, thought provoking, eye opening.

I must take the time to say to all the Bush bashers who take the time to voice their disapproval of a great man: Who among you can stand where he stands, who among you can do what he does on a daily routine? Who among you would have the strength to stand among all that he confronts? Who among you have taken the time to pray for our president on a daily basis? Who among you have asked God to bless him with wisdom, knowledge and strength? Who voices encouragement for our president?

Who? If you have words of encouragement, then speak out and let your voice be heard. Hiding under a rock, staying in your realm of no confrontations or closing your door to the need is a coward's way out. Many are outraged and say they want a change, then speak out for that change. Remember Congress passes the laws that dictate our spending, and remember also we have a Democrat Congress with the worst record of all time and it's time for a change. Can you say amen?

Frank H. Parrish Sr.

Cottonwood

Rich memories under the lake

The article last Sunday about Lake Shasta relics brought back memories from back in 1977, when we drove our 1930 Model A from Lakehead to Salt Creek on the old road. Another amazing thing about the bridges is that the center stripe is still visible. It’s probably visible on the road too, but the road is buried under silt. Since our Model A “grew up” in Dunsmuir, we figure it was traveling a road she’d been on before.

David Dewey

Oroville

What will Herger do without Bush?

If nothing else, our congressman, Wally Herger, is consistent.

He voted against the override of the veto of SCHIP (insurance for children) because the country did not have the $35 billion it would cost over five years and Bush did not want the bill to pass. He did vote to cut payments to doctors because the country did not have the money to continue to pay them at the same rate and Bush wanted the cut.

Now he votes to spend $700 billion dollars (that we must not have) because rich corporation heads want it and Bush wants it. He wants to give our money to the guys who got us in this mess just like he wanted money from them when he was running a political action committee to pay off his fellow Republicans so they would vote for him for a seat on the Ways and Means Committee.

And it was Herger who pledged not to raise taxes for any reason, even paying off this $700 billion he just voted to spend or the $10 billion a month he voted for and we are still spending on the wars.

Now I don’t know about you, but it seems to me to be a little strange that Congressman Herger is willing to incur big debt for corporations rather than small debt for individuals with a promise not to raise the money necessary to repay the debt. How would that work in your household? But you got to give it to him; he is consistent. Wonder what he will do without Bush? Probably go back to being one of the most inconspicuous members of Congress.

Art McBride

Redding

Democrats fed Fannie foul-up

Reading Bob Walden’s letter (Wednesday), it is clear he needs a good civics lesson.

While the Republicans did control Congress, because of the filibuster rule in the Senate, the Democrats stopped any significant legislation to correct the growing problems in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. President Clinton recently stated his administration tried to tighten the rules governing these two companies and his own party in Congress stopped him from making the changes that would have helped prevent the financial mess we find ourselves in today.

In the future, Walden needs to get the facts straight before he unfairly calls people media hacks.

George Rychetsky Jr.

Anderson

Comments

Posted by blue on October 12, 2008 at 6:35 a.m.

Joan Manning -

You wrote: "Professionals in drug addiction and law enforcement endorse Proposition 5."

Now, professionals in drug addiction I can understand endorsing Prop. 5; However, I'd like to know where you got your information about law enforcement endorsing Prop. 5.

The California Police Chiefs Assoc., California District Attorney's Assoc., Peace Officers Research Association of Calif. all oppose Prop. 5.

The premise behind this initiative is to keep non-violent drug-offenders out of the overcrowded prison system; however, no first time offender arrested solely for possession would ever be sent to prison.

Proposition 5 shortens parole for methamphetamine dealers and other drug felons from 3 years – to just 6 months.

Proposition 5 is strongly opposed by Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD) because it provides a way for those who kill or maim others while under the influence to avoid criminal prosecution.

Proposition 5 could provide, in effect, a “get-out-of-jail-free” card to defendants charged with crimes e.g. domestic violence, child abuse, mortgage fraud, identity theft, vehicular manslaughter, insurance fraud and auto theft, letting them effectively escape criminal prosecution altogether. If a violent offender is granted a hearing using “the drugs made me do it” defense, the burden of proof shifts to the prosecution to prove that the defendant should be held responsible for his or her crimes.

Proposition 5 goes far beyond the drug-dependent individual; it also applies to drug dealers. For example those found with up to $50,000 worth of meth would be treated the same as an individual user. We need to keep focused on helping those who are drug-dependent, rather than dealers profiting off addiction. Prop 5 treats meth dealers the same as an individual drug user.

Proposition 5 is universally opposed by organizations representing rank-and-file police officers, police chiefs, prosecutors and parole supervisors because they know that shortening parole for drug dealers will dramatically increase violent crime rates.

Proposition 5 sets up two new bureaucracies with no accountability, at a cost of hundreds of millions.

Proposition 5 falsely claims that it will save money, but in fact, costs will be shifted from the state to the counties, which may be forced to raise taxes.


Posted by Treebones on October 12, 2008 at 6:37 a.m.

Who let the dogs out, woof,woof, woof, woofwoof.

Man, that's the best I can come up with without more coffee. What a string of letter's to the editor we've been reading the last few days.

Descriminate for our children's sake!
George Bush is a great man?!
Pray for Constitutional integrity?
Who's the "real" Obama?

I'm kind of feeling like Michael Wiley when he finds gut piles in the middle of his road.


Posted by 420 on October 12, 2008 at 6:37 a.m.

I was surprised not to find an article about the Eddie Money concert at Big League Dreams in the news. BLD was due to pay the city rent (cash) this year but due to Mantecia building a park for BLD and the bay area players preferring to play there, less driving time, Reddings rent is not going to be as much as expected. BLD has been such a disappointment that a couple of years ago Little Ken Murray lied on his radio program and announced an inflated amount of rent they were paying when in fact BLD was not even paying rent yet. This is one reason Redding would be wise to vote out Little Ken. I wonder if BLD is laughing at us right now and saying "We said we would bring Money to Redding"


Posted by gpep3 on October 12, 2008 at 6:46 a.m.

Domestic Terrorist? William Ayers has never been brought to trial or convicted. He is a Distinguished Professor of Education at the University of Illinois; he has written several books on education: he received the Outstanding citizen of the year award from Mayor John Daley's office in Chicago, he served on the board of directors of an innovative education reform institution funded by Walter Annenburg foundation with Obama, before Obama ran for office along with ten other board members. Do we require police checks of every member of a charitable board one might sit on? Oh, Ayers doesnt have a police record. Give me a break, right wingnuts.


Posted by 420 on October 12, 2008 at 6:54 a.m.

Joan Manning, The failure rate for rehab is somewhere between 80% and 95% so while the twickers are locked up at least they aren't terrorizing the rest of us. I would support life in prison without parole for meth manufactures and large dealers, maybe even capital punishment.


Posted by srexley on October 12, 2008 at 7:52 a.m.

"Give me a break, right wingnuts"

He is an unrepentent terrorist who on the morning of 9-11 said he wished his organization had bombed more. He was a fugitive for 10 years (or something like that) and then pardoned.

That the left thinks he is so great says more than the "right wingnuts" who are bothered by folks like Ayers.


Posted by 420 on October 12, 2008 at 7:59 a.m.

Ansel R Wilson-Briggs
All I ever hear about the poor quality of our schools is that they need more money to do a better job. I believe the poor quality of the teachers should be addressed. Remember, you can't give a cull a raise and expect him to turn into a good man.


Posted by Dionysus on October 12, 2008 at 8:07 a.m.

in response to blue

Blue: you wrote a fine fact-based posting and I don't disagree with your overall sentiment.
However, I would assert that the CPCA, CDAA, and PORAC are all labor unions and public relation organizations - just like the correctional officers association - and their support is more politically based and self-serving than having the best interests of the public at heart.


Posted by richsteele on October 12, 2008 at 8:20 a.m.

Joan Manning rehabs have never worked. What makes you think that throwing more money at it will make it better?


Posted by CultureWarrior on October 12, 2008 at 8:34 a.m.

To all the wing-nuts who want to "protect marriage" by passing Prop. 8 - try reading all the letters in support of it, but replace the words "gay" with "interracial". Sounds kind of shocking, eh?

Forty years ago, many of the same "family-based" arguments being used against gay marriage were used by groups trying keep mixed race couples from marrying. Back then, as now, it took courageous judges to overturn laws that were clearly unconstitutional.

The troglodytes were wrong then, and they're wrong now.

Say No to Hate. Vote No on 8.


Posted by richsteele on October 12, 2008 at 8:34 a.m.

in response to gpep3

Did you have a gallon of Clinton Kool Aid or are you living under a rock someplace. Ayers and his wife confessed to be leaders of the Weathermen and were only let go because of a Liberal judge and an FBI agent agent that mishandled evidence. I remember that trial and it was a trvesty of justice. He also said after 9/11 that he wished he had done more. His books are socialistic in nature and his children's educational guidelines are straight out of the brain washing programs that Hugo Chavez and others use to teach our young what a bad place America is.
The man professes to hate America and its capitalistic ways and seeks change to more socialistic programs.

The problem being is that he fits right in with the current bunch of professors that can't so they teach and they teach far left socialistic liberalism. That the vast majority of Americans despise. The other problem is that people are also known by the people they associate with. Obama has a long history with this flake and is Obama's change going to be the radical left of Ayres.


Posted by stanlittle on October 12, 2008 at 8:41 a.m.

The Rev. James Wilson doesn't know what he's talking about!
He can turn his church onto political advocacy very simply. All he has to do is tell his contributors that their contributions are no longer tax deductible.
What he advocates is a method of allowing political contributions to be tax deductible.
His claim that his First Amendment right to free speech is being harmed is absolute hokum. He's presenting a right-wing destructive Christian talking-point that has no merit.


Posted by Treehugger on October 12, 2008 at 8:52 a.m.

Keep it up, Mr. Perreault et al. The more you right wingers scream that Obama has terrorist connections, is a closet Muslim, etc., the higher his poll numbers go.

Obama-Biden '08
Jeff Morris for District 2


Posted by greenmill on October 12, 2008 at 8:55 a.m.

Bush’s leadership is comparable to Jack Nicholson’s role as R.P. McMurphy in “One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest”, after the lobotomy.
His daddy complex has cost the life of 4,181 of our military and almost 100,000 civilian deaths due to military action since 2003. And there is no end in sight.
His war has doubled the National Debt to $10 trillion dollars.
He lowered taxes on the rich.
He invaded Iraq instead of winning in Afghan-Pakistan.
He loosened controls on Wall Street.
He has destroyed the faith & reputation of the U.S. throughout the world.
He should be ashamed to face the nation.


Posted by sound_of_reason on October 12, 2008 at 9 a.m.

To all of the people that support the republicans. You are being lied to on a daily basis. They have bought up all the media so they can lie to more people. They changed rules of media ownership to accomplish this. Those rules were in place to prevent what the republicans have done.

My advice to you is stop not only listening to, but forwarding the lies of the republican party. And most importantly, stop voting for the crooks so we can get our free country back.


Posted by randy on October 12, 2008 at 9:05 a.m.

in response to richsteele

What you perceive as attacks on America by people you perceive as "Socialists" are your own false perceptions. Free run capitalism is what has brought us to this place where we are against a wall of reality. Everyone cannot live in their own personal kingdom of financial success simple because sooner or later the money will have to backed up with something. The something is usually a material resource such as gold, food, land etc. The game "monopoly" works fine on the kitchen table where you can push it all into a box when your done but trying to live it is another story that will over and over run into the wall of reality.


Posted by NorCalHeathen3 on October 12, 2008 at 9:09 a.m.

Wow... The RS sure has turned into a wing-nut publishing company for the last two days.

Stan Little gets it right... If the Rev. Wilson wants to turn his church into a political pulpit, he's free to do so... but his church will have to pay taxes. It works the same way for every other non-profit org out there... not just churches.

Then there is the continued barrage of letters regarding prop 8. When are these people going to stop trying to inject their religion into the constitution that serves all of us... religious or not? I suspect I know the answer... and it ain't pretty.

Finally, we come to the spate of nasty screeds about Barack Obama. Never have I seen a newspaper, which claims to not take sides in this election, promote such a one sided view... especially so close to election day. Granted, it does fuel the fire in the comment areas and gets us all fired up. But, I would expect, considering that one in three Shasta County residents (and maybe more) will be voting for Obama, that they could see fit to publish at least one letter that doesn't ask the same idiotic questions we've been hearing forever. All the false concern over "who is Obama, really?" is a thinly veiled attempt to instill unwarranted fear in white voters. These same people never ask "who is John McCain"... In a logical world (LOL), one would ask the same questions of both candidates. Both men have been vetted for many years now and are essentially clean, with the exception of some really old and unsubstantiated claims against both of them. One would think that would allow the conversation to be based upon issues... but low and behold... those issues don't favor the Republican candidate, so they want to focus on BS. Wow, big surprise.


Posted by radical1 on October 12, 2008 at 9:16 a.m.

Just got this in an email and thought I would share. BE AMERICAN!

In a recent interview, General Norman Schwartzkopf was asked if he thought there was room for forgiveness
toward the people who have harbored and abetted the terrorists who perpetrated the 9/11 attacks on America.
His answer was classic Schwartzkopf.

"I believe that forgiving them is God's function.
OUR job is to arrange the meeting."


Posted by radical1 on October 12, 2008 at 9:17 a.m.

in response to Treebones

who is michael wiley?


Posted by radical1 on October 12, 2008 at 9:19 a.m.

in response to 420

How about child molesters and sexual predators???


Posted by radical1 on October 12, 2008 at 9:23 a.m.

in response to Treehugger

If that is what America is changing to, so be it. What say you?


Posted by Ken on October 12, 2008 at 9:25 a.m.

David Perreault seems to be typical of angry conservatives who have managed to convince themselves that they are somehow being cheated in this election. It seems the forces of goodness and light are being vanquished by that ol' devil the liberal media, who are coddling, conniving and conspiring on behalf of the Evil One, Barack Obama, who by such reprehensible methods as eloquence, intelligence, knowledge and composed coherence is tricking the gullible American public into seeing him as a gifted leader pleading for the unity we so desperately need. What a scoundrel!

Whence arises this ardent conviction that conservative government has proven itself and of a right ought to be continued in office, and that events to the contrary are somehow blasphemous aberrations of justice?

There is certainly no source for this to be found in the useless pre-emptive war of choice in Iraq that is still simmering along after nearly five long years, to the tune of nearly a trillion dollars. It is not to be found in the record, astronomical national debt bequeathed to us by the borrow and spend Bush administration. No source can be discovered in the titanic economic collapse we find ourselves in the midst of, brought on by the fervent unregulated free market orthodoxy first planted by Reagan and fiercely nurtured by Bush.

Paradoxically, the real source seems to be in a massive, self-pitying, self-indulgent wallow in the muck and mire of victimhood, so loudly and frequently despised and reviled by conservatives as the refuge of the weakling liberals who want everything done for them. Despite this, conservatives seem to have found a new and congenial role for themselves as victims.

This self-deception is tragic, and if these angry people do not listen to McCain's own rejection of their divisive, fallacious delusions, then I truly despair for our country.

The problems we face are very real and very big, and if we put all of our energy into crying foul and into stoking up this awful partisan hatred, then history will simply pass us by, and the sound of our bitter family quarrel will be the last fading echoes of our presence heard in the world.

There is far too much at stake for us to continue on this path. Let us please recognize our commonality, and whoever wins, accept our own small personal measure of disappointment as the price of the unity we so desperately need.


Posted by radical1 on October 12, 2008 at 9:28 a.m.

in response to greenmill

His war has doubled the National Debt to $10 trillion dollars.
~~~~~~~

Every body says his war. when it started, EVERYBODY was united behind him.

No, I don't want to continue with the war either, but say it right. This is America's war, whether you like it or not.

Your congress keeps funding "his war", so I guess it is OUR war.

Bring 'em home from every country that is not AMERICA!


Posted by radical1 on October 12, 2008 at 9:31 a.m.

in response to sound_of_reason

The congress is dominated by DEMOCRATS! Where have you been? There is your free country.


Posted by NorCalHeathen3 on October 12, 2008 at 9:34 a.m.

BTW - Two new newspaper endorsements for Obama today... these come from a big-time swing state to boot - OHIO!

The Dayton Daily News AND The Toledo Blade have both announced endorsements for Obama.

I take the RS refusal to endorse a presidential candidate as a positive sign... It's certainly better than a McCain endorsement!


Posted by john on October 12, 2008 at 9:44 a.m.

in response to radical1

Then when should we start pursuing them?

Mccain says he knows how to get bin Laden.

When will he share this with the rest of us?


Posted by john on October 12, 2008 at 9:47 a.m.

in response to mk

The lower the stock market goes, the higher Obama's numbers go.

It's the economy, stupid.


Posted by onandonanon on October 12, 2008 at 9:48 a.m.

in response to Ken

Ken: Yes, Conservatives as victims. Their shrill chorus will only get louder and more desperate as they begin to realize the rejection they face. I may allow myself some comfort in their disconsolation. There's a satisfaction in seeing the haughty humbled. Sore winners, sore losers.


Posted by NorCalHeathen3 on October 12, 2008 at 9:53 a.m.

in response to mk

"Has anyone noticed that the higher Obama's poll numbers go, the farther down the stock market slides?"

- The same could be said of the correlation between President Bush speaking from the White House on economic issues every day last week... On several of those occasions, the Dow actually fell when he made negative comments and rose when he said things Wall St. wanted to hear.

In reality, both your claim and mine are False cause fallacies... (look up "post hoc ergo propter hoc" in your Funk & Wagnalls). No conclusive evidence can be presented for either argument.

Or just look here:
http://www.logicalfallacies.info/posthoc.html

"The Latin phrase "post hoc ergo propter hoc" means, literally, "after this therefore because of this." The post hoc fallacy is committed when it is assumed that because one thing occurred after another, it must have occurred as a result of it."


Posted by radical1 on October 12, 2008 at 9:53 a.m.

in response to john

It was a quote I got in the email. Didn't say I agree or disagree with it.

BTW, john, I am in Las Vegas this morning closing a deal for $11,000 worth of refurbished slot machines. Not bad for a part time business,eh. What are you doing with all your spare time?


Posted by Ken on October 12, 2008 at 9:56 a.m.

in response to onandonanon

Huckabee showed great insight and wisdom when he said "I'm a conservative, but I'm not mad at anybody". These days, a conservative who is not angry seems unclothed.

When are they ever happy?


Posted by radical1 on October 12, 2008 at 10 a.m.

in response to Ken

We Conservatives are ALWAYS happy when democrats are unhappy.

Not really. I think everybody should just,

"be happy, don't worry".

Why should I care how you feel? Heck, I don't even know you.


Posted by radical1 on October 12, 2008 at 10:04 a.m.

All of us neede to say a prayer for nch3 and a great big BLESS YOU!

Just teasing heathen. It's a boring day. Can't wait for tomorrow morning. Time to bring some Vegas money home to spend in Redding.

:)


Posted by gpep3 on October 12, 2008 at 10:04 a.m.

in response to srexley

correction again: Ayers claims he never said that. What he said he meant was that he wished he could have done more to end the war. Ayers seems to be accepted as an exemlpary citezen where he is well known. I wish we had more people like him in Redding. Again, Ayers has full rights to work and circulate in our society. If he is a terrorist as you claim then why hasnt law enforcement taken him off the streets, wingnut?


Posted by 420 on October 12, 2008 at 10:06 a.m.

in response to radical1

OK


Posted by radical1 on October 12, 2008 at 10:06 a.m.

in response to gpep3

Uh, I think he said he was pardoned?


Posted by radical1 on October 12, 2008 at 10:08 a.m.

in response to gpep3

People who get pardons don't become prisoners, they become LIBERAL democrats.


Posted by radical1 on October 12, 2008 at 10:12 a.m.

in response to onandonanon

Sore winners, sore losers.
~~~

You dems should know all about that little statement. You lose often enough.

Now it will be your turn to crow for 4 years and then ours a gain


Posted by NorCalHeathen3 on October 12, 2008 at 10:13 a.m.

in response to radical1

"All of us need to say a prayer for nch3 and a great big BLESS YOU!"

LOL... I don't mind people praying for me. It certainly can't hurt and is a nice gesture... even if I don't think it will actually accomplish anything other than promoting a friendly attitude. :-D

Good luck on the slot machine deal.


Posted by radical1 on October 12, 2008 at 10:20 a.m.

Great men in history

HST

Ike

JFK (Once and assasinated)

Richard (once and a start)

Ronny (Twice)

GHWB

GWB (twice)


Posted by onandonanon on October 12, 2008 at 10:26 a.m.

in response to radical1

Sure, change the topic. He didn't ask you to care how he feels, so why would you ask why you should care? Silly Neocon. You guys have trouble following a thought in a straight line, keep detouring back to your talking points and warm attitudes.

I guess I could be happy and not worry if there was much to be happy about and not much to worry about. Sounds like some kinda KoolAid, just ignore the mess the Republicans have left us and maybe it will go away.


Posted by Ken on October 12, 2008 at 10:39 a.m.

in response to radical1

Nobody's happiness should depend on another's unhappiness. It's not a zero sum game.

I trust, however, you are joking.

You may not know me, but you know what I think.


Posted by radical1 on October 12, 2008 at 10:40 a.m.

in response to onandonanon

I don't care how you feel either. I don't know you.

You can fix our errors and we will be fixing ALL your screw ups in 4 years. At least we will try. It may take 8 years.

Vote out ALL incumbents! D's or R's.


Posted by radical1 on October 12, 2008 at 10:44 a.m.

in response to Ken

I was joking.

Yes, I know what you think.

Don't always agree, but I know when you tell me, and, believe it or not, I listen.


Posted by Buzz_Fledderjohn on October 12, 2008 at 10:44 a.m.

Have you seen the latest? McCain is starting to stand up to the people at his rallies who are accusing Obama of being a traitor, terrorist, Arab, etc.

And they're booing him. His own rank-and-file are booing him because he's refusing to go along with the foaming-at-the-mouth craziness.

And he hasn't just done it once. He's done it repeatedly over the past couple of days.

Good for him. My respect for the man is partly restored.


Posted by radical1 on October 12, 2008 at 10:46 a.m.

in response to onandonanon

You need to take a lighten up pill.

Life can be a bowl of berries if you let it.


Posted by Buzz_Fledderjohn on October 12, 2008 at 10:47 a.m.

in response to radical1

The last three "Great Men" on your list are responsible for increasing our national debt from less than $1 trillion dollars to more than $10 trillion dollars.

The last one likely will go down as the worst president in history.


Posted by radical1 on October 12, 2008 at 10:50 a.m.

in response to Buzz_Fledderjohn

McCain is a RINO.

He deals with democrats.

He wants to be loved by democrats.

I guess he subscribes to, "Love thine enemy".


Posted by NorCalHeathen3 on October 12, 2008 at 10:50 a.m.

in response to Buzz_Fledderjohn

"And they're booing him."

- Sarah Palin is getting booed as well. The crowd at a Philly Flyers hockey game let her have it yesterday.

Watch it here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gd4wQd_gbj8


Posted by radical1 on October 12, 2008 at 10:52 a.m.

in response to Buzz_Fledderjohn

So? JFK had his Bay of Pigs.

All great men had SOME good and some bad.

HST dropped the atomic bomb.

Temper justice with mercy.


Posted by ReddingRunner on October 12, 2008 at 10:57 a.m.

in response to Dionysus

CDAA is neither a labor union nor a public relation organizaton. The organization exists for training and legislative advocacy.


Posted by radical1 on October 12, 2008 at 11:04 a.m.

in response to Buzz_Fledderjohn

The last three "Great Men" on your list are responsible for increasing our national debt from less than $1 trillion dollars to more than $10 trillion dollars.
~~
If we hadn't wasted the money this way, we would have done it another way. If reps do it, it is wasteful and terrible. If dems do it, it went for a good cause.
~~~

The last one likely will go down as the worst president in history.
.........
Do you think they will FINALLY stop talking about the peanut farmer? Now we have 2 lousy presidents to rave and rant about.

Obama will be next.


Posted by connemm on October 12, 2008 at 11:06 a.m.

Sooooo radical1, does your statement mean we will be welcoming Scooter Libby into our "liberal" fold, or is it a pick and choose proposition? You seem to fond of winnowing information that only supports your own views.


Posted by connemm on October 12, 2008 at 11:09 a.m.

omitted "be" preceding fond....


Posted by Buzz_Fledderjohn on October 12, 2008 at 11:10 a.m.

in response to radical1

> If we hadn't wasted the money this way, we would have done it another way. If reps do it, it is wasteful and terrible. If dems do it, it went for a good cause.

Nonsense. Most of the federal budget is not discretionary. The biggest ticket item is the Department of Defense. Neither the Demos or the Repubs have the stomach to control defense spending.

The Repub "Great Men" on you list ran up almost $10 trillion in debt not so much by increasing spending over the Demo presidents that they succeeded (though they did that, too), but by cutting taxes and placing the debt on future generations.

Dubya, in particular, would have us believe that the war in Iraq was vital to our nation's security, but not so vital that we shouldn't pass the cost on to our kids instead of pay for it ourselves. He became the first president in our nation's history to cut taxes at a time of war.

Shame.


Posted by Ken on October 12, 2008 at 11:12 a.m.

in response to radical1

I'm glad to hear it. We should all follow your example more often.


Posted by Ken on October 12, 2008 at 11:15 a.m.

in response to Buzz_Fledderjohn

Before the campaign started, and especially before Sarah, I think we all had a real choice.

It's too bad the McCain I think most of us respect has not been the one running for office this time.

Think where we might be if he had gotten the nod instead of W.....


Posted by radical1 on October 12, 2008 at 11:21 a.m.

in response to connemm

You seem to fond of winnowing information that only supports your own views.
~~~

As do you and ALL others here. What's your point?


Posted by srexley on October 12, 2008 at 11:22 a.m.

in response to gpep3

"If he is a terrorist as you claim then why hasnt law enforcement taken him off the streets,"

Because he was pardoned.

"wingnut?"

See if you can make an "argument" without a personal insult. Keeps it more civilized.


Posted by radical1 on October 12, 2008 at 11:23 a.m.

in response to connemm

:)

I understood the meaning.


Posted by stanlittle on October 12, 2008 at 11:28 a.m.

in response to razor

RACIST CRAP!


Posted by radical1 on October 12, 2008 at 11:31 a.m.

in response to Buzz_Fledderjohn

Do you know what one of the best things in this country is?

Everybody can and does have an opinion.

I can't say I wholly disagree with your opinion. You sound like an intelligent person. I still like W enough to go have a beer and pizza with him, but I wouldn't want to see him back for a third term...don't start with McCain the RINO with me, either.

Vote out ALL incumbents!


Posted by john on October 12, 2008 at 11:32 a.m.

If Proposition 8 passes, who will Republicans pick up in men's rooms?


Posted by radical1 on October 12, 2008 at 11:33 a.m.

in response to stanlittle

Why is that racist? Obama hangs around with some pretty unsavory people.


Posted by NorCalHeathen3 on October 12, 2008 at 11:34 a.m.

in response to razor

"If Obama is elected it will give a lot of shady people power and that is not good for this country."

- And how, exactly, do you justify such sentiments? Surely you have a reason for thinking this is true? Will your reasoning withstand logical scrutiny? I doubt it...


Posted by radical1 on October 12, 2008 at 11:37 a.m.

in response to john

If Proposition 8 passes, who will Republicans pick up in men's rooms?
~~~

YOU!

Why do you think they call it a JOHN?

Boy, you stepped right into that one. I couldn't resist. Didn't want to resist. Didn't even try to resist.

GOTCHA

:)


Posted by john on October 12, 2008 at 11:37 a.m.

If McCain is elected a lot more shady people will STAY in power.
And that is far more to the point.


Posted by radical1 on October 12, 2008 at 11:41 a.m.

in response to john

Really?

Who and why would they STAY in power?

QUICK! look it up and copy/paste, omitting anything that doesn't suit you, of course.


Posted by radical1 on October 12, 2008 at 11:42 a.m.

Is it GrEyhound or GrAyhound?


Posted by radical1 on October 12, 2008 at 11:52 a.m.

in response to NorCalHeathen3

Heathen, if YOU were elected, God forbid, wouldn't you take your friends and supporters with you?

If you HAD a certain religion, wouldn't you take that with you?

Actually, the only thing either one of these guys is going to change in their lives is the office they sit in.

I can't fault them for that. We all carry on our own traditions.

Wouldn't it be great if all nominees had to open their closets and bring forth ALL their skeletons for us all to peruse BEFORE they could run?


Posted by radical1 on October 12, 2008 at 11:55 a.m.

in response to razor

I have mixed feelings and its an uncomfortable feeling and I should have just kept my mouth shut.
~~~

Don't EVER say that. We only have a few freedoms left and, I fear, they will be gone before too long.


Posted by radical1 on October 12, 2008 at 11:59 a.m.

in response to radical1

If you want to know about Freedom of speech and other freedoms, talk to nch, mk, GW, and, man this pains me to say,...john.

These guys can speak volumes about our freedoms and how they can be taken away.

Darn, I AM a republican, right?


Posted by radical1 on October 12, 2008 at 12:02 p.m.

A random thought...I wonder if half way through his time in office, will we be calling for his impeachment?

That could be asked of either nominee.


Posted by srexley on October 12, 2008 at 12:15 p.m.

in response to gpep3

Correction on Ayers being pardoned. I wanted to check my accuracy after I posted (not the best order to do things in). It appears Ayers was not pardoned. He had Federal charges against him and he became a fugitive until after the statute of limitations was up. Here are some tidbits though:

''I don't regret setting bombs,'' Bill Ayers said. ''I feel we didn't do enough.'' Mr. Ayers, who spent the 1970's as a fugitive in the Weather Underground,"

From his wife: "In 1969, after the Manson family murders in Beverly Hills, Ms. Dohrn told an S.D.S. audience: ''Dig it! Manson killed those pigs, then they ate dinner in the same room with them, then they shoved a fork into a victim's stomach.''

How Ayers hid from the law:

"During his fugitive years, Mr. Ayers said, he lived in 15 states, taking names of dead babies in cemeteries who were born in the same year as he.

"Mr. Ayers, who in 1970 was said to have summed up the Weatherman philosophy as: ''Kill all the rich people. Break up their cars and apartments. Bring the revolution home, kill your parents, that's where it's really at,''"

So I will stick by the premise that is ok to mistrust people like him. He had a belief that the war was bad, and therefore it was ok to kill people he disagreed with. That is what a terrorist is.


Posted by Ken on October 12, 2008 at 12:22 p.m.

in response to radical1

If we have not tried to impeach Dubyah, it's pretty hard to imagine what the next guy might do to top him and instigate impeachment proceedings.


Posted by radical1 on October 12, 2008 at 12:37 p.m.

in response to Ken

I read and hear on news of ATTEMPTS to impeach W. They just bhaven't got the process started. It is said that the papers are ready to go.


Posted by radical1 on October 12, 2008 at 12:42 p.m.

in response to Ken

www.petitiontoimpeach.com

impeachbushbook.com

www.impeachbush.tv/impeach

These are questionable sites, but the call is out there. Many, many more.


Posted by radical1 on October 12,